Legal Opinion

Mills v. Brown

California Supreme Court

Decided August 20, 1928No. Docket No. Sac. 4025PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

Appeal by defendant Addie I. Try on from an order refusing to change the place of trial from the county of Sacramento to the city and county of San Francisco. She supports her demand by an affidavit of merits containing the averment that she is a resident of the city and county of San Francisco. Defendant E. H. Tryon consented to the making of said application by his co-defendant. The defendant Brown did not appear in this proceeding.

Briefly, the facts are that on the first day of October, 1925, defendant Royal G. Brown, a resident of the county of Sacramento, gave to plaintiff his promissory…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McClung v. WattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Flinn v. FerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Hellman v. LoganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Bank of Ukiah v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Harper v. GordonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. American Savings & Loan Ass'n v. LeedsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Johnson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  3. Freeman v. DowlingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  4. California Collection Agency, Inc. v. FontanaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  5. Gottesfeld v. Richmaid Ice Cream Co.California Court of Appeal · 1953

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API