Legal Opinion
Freeman v. Dowling
California Supreme Court
Decided October 16, 1933No. Docket No. S.F. 14850PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
The plaintiff filed a complaint in the county of Santa Clara joining as defendants the city of Palo Alto and its administrative officers, and the appealing defendant, J. A. Dowling, who is a resident of the city and county of San Francisco. Dowling moved for a change of venue upon the ground of such residence. The motion for a change of the place of trial was twice denied by the Superior Court of Santa Clara County and this appeal is from the orders so entered.
According to the facts as set forth in the complaint the respondent entered into a street improvement contract with the city of Palo…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McClung v. WattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Sayward v. HoughtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Hellman v. LoganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Quint v. DimondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Greenleaf v. JacksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Peiser v. MettlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Gutierrez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Hays v. CowlesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- California Collection Agency, Inc. v. FontanaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- White v. Kaiser-Frazer Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1950
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.