State ex rel. Rose v. Hindley
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Sullivan, J., entered August SO, 1911, upon sustaining a demurrer to a complaint, dismissing an action for a writ of mandamus.
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
The relator, Frank Rose, commenced this action in the superior court for Spokane county to compel his reinstatement in the employ of the city as a bacteriologist, from which employment he claims to have been unlawfully dismissed by the mayor. Upon the sustaining of demurrers to the relator’s complaint, he elected to stand thereon and not plead further, when judgment was rendered against him denying the relief he prayed for. He thereupon appealed to this court.
In 1893 the legislature passed an act providing for the creation of city boards of health, in all cities and towns of the state, to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Butner v. BoifeuilletSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- State ex rel. Reiley v. ChatfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1898
- Ward v. . Elizabeth CitySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
- Bradley Engineering & Machinery Co. v. MuzzyWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- Mansfield v. First National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1893
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State ex rel. McBride v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1918
- State Ex Rel. Thorp v. DevinWashington Supreme Court · 1946
- Schultz v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1916
- State v. GustafsonWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- Mollner v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1959
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.