State v. Gustafson
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Mackintosh, J., entered November 14, 1914, upon a trial and conviction of being an habitual criminal.
1Opinion of the CourtMorris, C. J.
Appellant, having been convicted below of the crime of being an habitual criminal, appeals.
Three errors are assigned. The first two, if sustained, call for a dismissal; .the third, for a reversal. First, it is contended that the information does not state facts sufficient to constitute a crime. Without setting out the information, it will be sufficient to say that, allowing for the difference in the nature of the crime charged, the charging part of the in*614formation is identical with that sustained in State v. Rowan, 84 Wash. 158, 146 Pac. 374.
The second claim of error is that appellant was not…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Linbeck v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1890
- State v. MyersWashington Supreme Court · 1894
- State v. RossWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- State v. AlexanderWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- State v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1914
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. ThorneWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. EdelsteinWashington Supreme Court · 1927
- Roth v. BellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979
- State Ex Rel. Edelstein v. HunekeWashington Supreme Court · 1926
- Whittlesey v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1917
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.