Legal Opinion

Myerchin v. Family Benefits, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 29, 2008No. G038569PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BEDSWORTH, Acting P. J .

We hold in this case that a party offered a monetary settlement of a lawsuit may accept the money or reject it, but may not take the money and continue the lawsuit. That is what Joseph Myerchin attempted to do in this case and that is why a summary judgment was entered against him. Shorty after accepting and spending the money paid to him pursuant to the settlement, Myerchin refused to dismiss the complaint. Instead, he argued the settlement agreement was unenforceable, because Family Benefits’ attorney had continued to negotiate it with him directly, even after…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  2. A & M PRODUCE CO. v. FMC Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1982
  3. Small v. Fritz Companies, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Abbott Ford, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Sime v. MaloufCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Village Northridge Homeowners Assn. v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Spencer v. DHI Mortg. Co., Ltd.District Court, E.D. California · 2009
  3. Duarte v. Pac. Specialty Ins. Co., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  4. Campion v. Old Republic Home Protection Co.District Court, S.D. California · 2011
  5. San Francisco Unified School District ex rel. Contreras v. First Student, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2013

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API