Legal Opinion

Wilmington Trust Co. v. Conner

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided March 26, 1980PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HERRMANN, Chief Justice:

In this action to recover a deficiency judgment under the Delaware Uniform Commercial Code, 6 Del.C. § 9-502(2), 1 in an automobile repossession case, we are asked to decide: (1) whether the notice of resale of the automobile after repossession sent by the creditor to the debtor was defective under 6 Del.C. § 9-504(3); 2 (2) if so, whether the defective nature of the notice precludes the creditor from obtaining a deficiency judgment under the Code; and (3) whether the debtor, in his counterclaim under 6 DeLC. § 9-507(1), 3 is entitled to statutory damages.

I

On December…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Norton v. Nat. Bank of Commerce of Pine BluffSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966
  2. Atlas Thrift Co. v. HoranCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  3. John W. Skeels v. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corporation v. Estelle A. Skeels, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964
  4. Community Manage. Ass'n of Colorado Sp. v. TousleyColorado Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. Bank of Gering v. GloverNebraska Supreme Court · 1974

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Babbitt Ford, Inc. v. Navajo Indian TribeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  2. Jacobs v. Healey Ford-Subaru, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  3. State Bank of Towner v. HansenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Chisolm v. TranSouth Financial Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2000
  5. Becker v. Hamada, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1982

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API