Cottam v. Heppner
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ZIMMERMAN, Justice:
Plaintiffs Glenn W. Heppner, Irvin Heppner, and the Riverdale Water Company (hereinafter collectively referred to as “the Heppners”) appeal from a judgment entered after a jury trial that awarded the bank a deficiency judgment for the difference between the amount due on a note executed by the Heppners and the amount realized from the sale of the collateral securing the note — a herd of cattle. The Heppners contend that in selling the cattle, the bank did not give the required notice and did not dispose of the collateral in a commercially reasonable manner, all as required…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- State v. KnightUtah Supreme Court · 1987
- Scharf v. BMG Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1985
- Norton v. Nat. Bank of Commerce of Pine BluffSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966
- Kimball v. CampbellUtah Supreme Court · 1985
- Atlas Thrift Co. v. HoranCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Hodges v. Gibson Products Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1991
- MBank El Paso, N.A. v. SanchezTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Doelle v. BradleyUtah Supreme Court · 1989
- Salisbury Livestock Co. v. Colorado Central Credit UnionWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
- Kelaidis v. Community First National Bank (In Re Kelaidis)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 2002
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.