Clark v. Tarr
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
GIVENS, Justice.
A general demurrer to appellant’s second amended • complaint was sustained and consequent judgment of dismissal entered, on the theory the complaint did not state a cause of action because no negligence of the bus driver in making the transfer delineated in the complaint could proximately cause appellant’s injury; and lack of authority of the driver to bind his principal in the transaction narrated.
The salient allegations of the complaint, perforce admitted by the general demurrer, are:
' That September 10, 1953 appellant was a pay passenger in one of respondent Company’s buses…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Brady v. Chicago & G. W. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
- Stearns Ex Rel. Stearns v. GravesIdaho Supreme Court · 1941
- Burns v. GettyIdaho Supreme Court · 1933
- Murray v. Lehigh Valley RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1895
- Curtis v. Siebrand Bros. Circus & Carnival Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1948
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Smith v. SharpIdaho Supreme Court · 1960
- Clements v. JungertIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
- United States of America, and Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Isaac MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- John Scowcroft & Sons Co. v. RoselleIdaho Supreme Court · 1955
- Russell v. City of Idaho FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 1956
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.