Legal Opinion

Carson City Savings Bank v. Carson City Elevator Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1892PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Error to Montcalm. (Smith, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, C. J.

The plaintiff is a corporation duly organized under the laws of this State February 1, 1887. The defendant is a corporation organized May 2, 1887¡, under Act No. 25, Laws of 1867, entitled—

“ An act to provide for the incorporation of associations for the purpose of constructing, owning, and controlling warehouses for the storage of grain and other commodities.”

Every stockholder in the plaintiff company at the time of its organization was also a stockholder in the defendant company at the time of the latter’s organization. There were but two of the stockholders of the defendant company not…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Whitney Arms Co. v. . BarlowNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  2. Gold-Mining Co. v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Bradley v. BallardIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
  4. Steam Navigation Co. v. WeedNew York Supreme Court · 1853
  5. Day v. Spiral Springs Buggy Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1885

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Kadish v. Garden City Equitable Loan & Building Ass'nIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Coit v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Meholin v. CarlsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Beach v. WakefieldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  5. Lewis v. American Savings & Loan Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API