McAleavy v. Lowe

The appellants on their appeal raise the following issues:(1) Sec. 94.72 (14) (b), Stats., does not apply to the sale of screenings by Cargill to Lowe because such sale was completed outside the jurisdiction of Wisconsin law, to wit, in the state of Minnesota.(2) The statute does not apply because screenings are not “a feed.”(3) The statute does not apply because there was no evidence of any mixture or adulteration of an injurious substance with the screenings.(4) That it was error to hold that the violation of the statute constituted negligence per se on the part of the two defendants,…