Legal Opinion

Carnegie v. Abrams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 28, 1971PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteuer, J.

Plaintiff has recovered in an action for brokerage commissions and we believe rightfully so. Defendant’s testator (herein defendant) engaged plaintiff to find a buyer for two buildings located on East 11th Street, Manhattan. The terms given plaintiff were $250,000 payable $50,000 in cash, $100,000 by assumption of an existing mortgage and $100,000 by a 10-year purchase-money mortgage. When plaintiff produced a buyer able and willing to purchase on those terms defendant decided that he wanted $100,000 in cash and a $50,000 mortgage. The proffered buyer agreed to this change. Defendant then…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Candid Productions, Inc. v. International Skating UnionDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1982
  2. Mocca Lounge, Inc. v. MisakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  3. Helmsley-Spear, Inc. v. Westdeutsche Landesbank GirozentraleDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
  4. Helmsley-Spear, Inc. v. KupferschmidAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  5. Donald Zucker Co. v. Prime Properties, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API