Carnegie v. Abrams
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtSteuer, J.
Plaintiff has recovered in an action for brokerage commissions and we believe rightfully so. Defendant’s testator (herein defendant) engaged plaintiff to find a buyer for two buildings located on East 11th Street, Manhattan. The terms given plaintiff were $250,000 payable $50,000 in cash, $100,000 by assumption of an existing mortgage and $100,000 by a 10-year purchase-money mortgage. When plaintiff produced a buyer able and willing to purchase on those terms defendant decided that he wanted $100,000 in cash and a $50,000 mortgage. The proffered buyer agreed to this change. Defendant then…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Candid Productions, Inc. v. International Skating UnionDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- Mocca Lounge, Inc. v. MisakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Helmsley-Spear, Inc. v. Westdeutsche Landesbank GirozentraleDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Helmsley-Spear, Inc. v. KupferschmidAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Donald Zucker Co. v. Prime Properties, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.