Rotec Industries, Inc. v. Mitsubishi Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, Circuit Judge:
This controversy arises out of the construction of a massive dam on the Yangtze River by the government of the People’s Republic of China. The parties competed for contracts to sell construction equipment to the Chinese government. Rotee Industries, Inc., appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to defendants on Rotec’s claim of violation of section 2(c) of the Robinson-Patman Act and on its Oregon state law claim of intentional interference with economic advantage. Rotee argues that the district court erred by holding that it lacked…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Miller v. GammieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. Copp Paving Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Chew v. GatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- McGanty v. StaudenrausOregon Supreme Court · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Singh v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Boyd v. AWB LTD.District Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Singh v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Blue Cross & Blue Shield v. Jemsek Clinic, P.A. (In Re Jemsek Clinic, P.A.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.