Legal Opinion
Singh v. Gonzales
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 24, 2007No. 05-16005PublishedCited by 132 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge McKEOWN; Concurrence by Judge WALLACE.
McKEOWN, Circuit Judge:
Amarjeet Singh, a native and citizen of India, brought three ineffective assistance of counsel (“IAC”) claims through a habeas petition filed with the district court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Singh’s habeas petition was filed after the enactment of the REAL ID Act, Pub.L. No. 109-13, § 106, 119 Stat. 231, 310-311 (2005). The district court dismissed the action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction on the ground that the REAL ID Act foreclosed Singh’s habeas claims.
The REAL ID Act dramatically changed the means…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Edwards v. CarpenterSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Reno v. American-Arab Anti-Discrimination CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Miguel Angel Iturribarria v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by132 opinions
- Vijendra K. Singh v HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- John Doe v. Merrick GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
- J.E. F.M. Ex Rel. Ekblad v. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Romero-Ruiz v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Saul Martinez v. Janet NapolitanoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
127 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.