State v. Straub
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBB, Judge.
The State brings this interlocutory appeal of the trial court’s order granting Joseph Straub’s motion to suppress his statements to the police. We reverse.
Issue
The State raises the following restated issue for our review: whether the trial court properly granted Straub’s motion to suppress.1
Facts and Procedural History
The facts reveal that around 3:40 a.m. on January 26, 1999, Officer Grable was sitting in his patrol car when he observed a truck with an attached snowplow closely following another truck. Thereafter, the driver of the lead trunk informed Officer Grable that…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Illinois v. WardlowSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. WatsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Welsh v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Jonathan D. Carpenter v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2014
- Johnson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
- Rideout v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
- Gompf v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. TrudelleNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.