Legal Opinion

Staten v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1978No. 9133PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Respondent insured appellant under a policy including $50,000 personal injury (no-fault) coverage, and $15/30,000 uninsured motorist protection. In 1974, appellant sustained serious injuries in an automobile collision with an uninsured motorist. Respondent paid basic reparation benefits pursuant to appellant’s no-fault coverage in excess of $15,000, but refused to pay additional claims under her uninsured motorist coverage. Appellant thereafter filed suit to recover the full $15,000 of uninsured motorist coverage, along with additional damages for breach of warranty and bad faith. The…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Monaco v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1976
  2. In re the Arbitration between Adams & Government Employees InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  3. Royal Globe Insurance v. ConnollyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  4. Rabideau v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976

4Cited by6 opinions

  1. Newton v. Nationwide Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979
  2. Keenan v. INDUSTRIAL INDEMNITY INS. CO. OF NORTHWESTWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Allstate Insurance v. MaglishNevada Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Mid-Century Insurance v. DanielNevada Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Keenan v. INDUSTRIAL INDEMNITY INS. CO. OF NORTHWESTWashington Supreme Court · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API