Keenan v. INDUSTRIAL INDEMNITY INS. CO. OF NORTHWEST
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCallow, J.
An automobile insurer who had issued an insurance policy providing both personal injury protection (PIP) and underinsured motorist coverages seeks reimbursement of PIP benefits previously paid to the insured, pursuant to a reimbursement provision in the policy. At issue is whether this reimbursement provision is enforceable to the extent that it prevents the insured from receiving a double recovery for her damages. The trial court disallowed any reimbursement of PIP benefits. We accepted direct review and reverse.
On March 13, 1981, while driving her automobile plaintiff Genevieve Keenan was…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- State Farm General Insurance v. EmersonWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Glidden v. Farmers Automobile InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
- Touchette v. Northwestern Mutual InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1972
- Britton v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1985
- Bradley v. Mid-Century InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Wilkie v. Auto-Owners InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
- Dayton v. Farmers Insurance GroupWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Roller v. Stonewall InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- Price v. Farmers Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
- Price v. Farmers InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1997
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.