Legal Opinion

Keenan v. INDUSTRIAL INDEMNITY INS. CO. OF NORTHWEST

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1987No. 52265-1, 52354-1PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCallow, J.

An automobile insurer who had issued an insurance policy providing both personal injury protection (PIP) and underinsured motorist coverages seeks reimbursement of PIP benefits previously paid to the insured, pursuant to a reimbursement provision in the policy. At issue is whether this reimbursement provision is enforceable to the extent that it prevents the insured from receiving a double recovery for her damages. The trial court disallowed any reimbursement of PIP benefits. We accepted direct review and reverse.

On March 13, 1981, while driving her automobile plaintiff Genevieve Keenan was…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. State Farm General Insurance v. EmersonWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Glidden v. Farmers Automobile InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Touchette v. Northwestern Mutual InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Britton v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Bradley v. Mid-Century InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1980

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Wilkie v. Auto-Owners InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Dayton v. Farmers Insurance GroupWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Roller v. Stonewall InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Price v. Farmers Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Price v. Farmers InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1997

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API