Legal Opinion

Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Fireman's Fund Insurance

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 30, 1971No. 44PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHARP, Justice.

The verdict of the jury, which established that at the time of the accident on 25 October 1966 Terry was operating the 1961 Oldsmobile within the scope of his permission from Tux, is not challenged by any assignment of error. Therefore, plaintiffs’ policy covered Terry’s operation of that vehicle imless the assigned risk policy which Fireman’s issued to Carson insuring the 1965 Oldsmobile covered Terry’s operation of the 1961 Oldsmobile is as a substitute vehicle for the 1965 Oldsmobile. If it did, Nationwide’s coverage is excluded; otherwise, not. Fireman’s concedes that the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. HayesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. Smith v. SimpsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  3. Harrelson Ex Rel. Randolph v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. Howard v. BoyceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  5. Hemphill v. Home Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1970

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Younts v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. Bartlett v. Amica Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1991
  3. Jenkins v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  4. Ohio Casualty Insurance v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  5. Teter v. CorleyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1978

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API