Legal Opinion

Capps v. City of Raleigh

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 21, 1978No. 7710SC90PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Judge.

At the outset we feel compelled again to point out that it is not a part of the function of the court on a motion for summary judgment to make findings of fact and conclusions of law. “As we have pointed out on previous occasions, finding the facts in a judgment entered on a motion for summary judgment presupposes that the facts are in dispute. ‘. . . [T]he Supreme Court and this Court have emphasized in numerous opinions that upon a motion for summary judgment it is no part of the court’s function to decide issues of fact but solely to determine whether there is an issue of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Taylor v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. Teachey v. . GurleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  3. Helms v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  4. Blankenship v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of Virginia · 1948
  5. Walker v. Town of ElkinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Williams v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of NCSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2003
  2. Phelps-Dickson Builders, LLC v. Amerimann PartnersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  3. In Re Estate of PopeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  4. Persis Nova Construction, Inc. v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  5. Sainz v. SainzCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API