O'Neill v. Southern National Bank
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HEDRICK, Judge.
We first consider the Bank’s purported appeal based on an exception to the 4 January 1978 Order denying the Bank’s Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. An Order denying a Rule 12(b)(6) motion is interlocutory and clearly not appealable. G.S. § 1-277; Smith v. State, 289 N.C. 303, 222 S.E. 2d 412 (1976); North Carolina Consumers Power, Inc. v. Duke Power Co., 285 N.C. 434, 206 S.E. 2d 178 (1974); Acorn v. Jones Knitting Corp., 12 N.C. App. 266, 182 S.E. 2d 862 (1971). Furthermore, the record…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Sutton v. DukeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- North Carolina Consumers Power, Inc. v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Sink v. EasterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- Gallimore v. SinkCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Washburn v. Beatt Equipment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1992
- Toomer v. Branch Banking and Trust Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- Watts v. Cumberland County Hospital System, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. McCoyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- Evans v. United Services Automobile Ass'nCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.