Legal Opinion

O'Neill v. Southern National Bank

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 6, 1979No. 7826SC269PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Judge.

We first consider the Bank’s purported appeal based on an exception to the 4 January 1978 Order denying the Bank’s Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. An Order denying a Rule 12(b)(6) motion is interlocutory and clearly not appealable. G.S. § 1-277; Smith v. State, 289 N.C. 303, 222 S.E. 2d 412 (1976); North Carolina Consumers Power, Inc. v. Duke Power Co., 285 N.C. 434, 206 S.E. 2d 178 (1974); Acorn v. Jones Knitting Corp., 12 N.C. App. 266, 182 S.E. 2d 862 (1971). Furthermore, the record…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Sutton v. DukeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. North Carolina Consumers Power, Inc. v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  4. Sink v. EasterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  5. Gallimore v. SinkCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Washburn v. Beatt Equipment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Toomer v. Branch Banking and Trust Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  3. Watts v. Cumberland County Hospital System, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  4. State v. McCoyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  5. Evans v. United Services Automobile Ass'nCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API