Legal Opinion

In Re Rust v. Missouri Dental Board

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided August 22, 1941PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEllison, J.

The appellant, a licensed dentist, appeals from a judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis City revoking his license and certificate. The hearing in that court was de novo, on appeal from a like order made by the Missouri Dental Board after a hearing under See. 10071, R. S. 1939, Sec. 13566, Mo. Stat. Ann., p. 7486, pocket part. The assignments of error are: (1) that, the parts of said Sec. 10071-upon which’the proceedings rest'are so-vague and indefinite as to violate the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, Constitution of the United States, - and See. 30, Art. II, Constitution…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Semler v. Oregon State Board of Dental ExaminersSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. State v. NaselloSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930
  3. State Ex Rel. Lentine v. State Board of HealthSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  4. State ex rel. Spriggs v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1913
  5. Ex Parte Diemer v. WeissSupreme Court of Missouri · 1938

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Spitcaufsky v. HattenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1944
  2. Flora Realty & Investment Co. v. City of LadueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  3. State Ex Rel. Klein v. HughesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1943
  4. Gaddy v. State Board of Registration for the Healing ArtsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1965
  5. Herrick Motor Co. v. Fischer Oldsmobile Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1967

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API