Legal Opinion

Coast Counties Real Estate & Investment Co. v. Monterey County Water Works

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 14, 1929No. Docket No. 6525PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff and against defendant and comes to this court upon a bill of exceptions.

The facts of the case follow. In the year 1907 plaintiff, referred to hereinafter as the Realty Company, had bought a tract of land in Monterey County. The purpose of the Realty Company was to subdivide the land and offer it for sale to the public. The area embraced somé 1600 lots. As a necessity, water was required and there was none available to the tract. A corporation, predecessor of defendant, was then operating in Monterey County and engaged…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. City of S. Pasadena v. Pasadena Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Eastman v. PiperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  4. Walsh v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  5. Norton v. BassettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wolas v. Crescent Commercial Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1948
  2. Moorhead v. ShaferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API