Legal Opinion

Hayden v. Philadelphia

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 14, 1955No. Appeal, 286PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Arnold,

Plaintiff instituted this action of trespass against the City of Philadelphia, alleging that she sustained personal injuries when she fell as a result of a defective sidewalk. The city joined as additional defendants the owner and the tenant of the abutting property, and the Philadelphia Gas Works. The latter joined as an additional defendant its paving contractor, Dan A. Cedrone, on the theory that he had agreed to indemnify it for damages recovered for injuries resulting from his failure to pave defects within 24 hours after notice to do so.

The jury returned a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. MacDonald v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  2. Danko v. Pittsburg Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  3. Bitting v. WolfeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Breskin v. 535 Fifth AvenueSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  2. Finney v. G. C. Murphy Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  3. Oliver v. Municipio de BayamónSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1963
  4. Smith v. Sheraden BankSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  5. Smith v. Penn Fruit Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API