Smith v. Penn Fruit Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
LORD, District Judge.
Defendant has filed this Motion for Judgment n. o. v. Considered most favorably to plaintiff, the testimony introduced at the trial established the following facts. The plaintiff had been shopping in defendant’s self-service food market. The food market is a large store receptive of a large volume of business. As an added convenience to shoppers using the store, the defendant had adjacent to the store a parking area. There is a cement walkway in front of the store which extends around the side and separates the store area from the parking lot. At or near the rear of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bruch v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
- Harrison Et Vir. v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Muslera v. Patton Clay Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Coolbroth v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
- Breskin v. 535 Fifth AvenueSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Eric Munzenmayer and Kathryn Munzenmayer, His Wife v. Lit Brothers, Inc., City Stores Company, Lit Brothers Division of City Stores CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957
- Price v. CrowlSuperior Court of Delaware · 1961