Legal Opinion

Rockford Memorial Hospital v. Havrilesko

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 20, 2006No. 2-06-0230 RelPublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Callum

Defendants, Michael and Kathy Havrilesko, on behalf of themselves and those similarly situated, appeal the dismissal of their second amended countercomplaint seeking relief under the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act (the Act) (815 ILCS 505/1 et seq. (West 2004)). The Havrileskos alleged that plaintiff, Rockford Memorial Hospital (RMH), violated the Act by concealing rates in excess of reasonable customary charges and concealing that they would be required to pay amounts not covered by insurance. They also alleged that a letter sent by RMH misrepresented facts about…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Connick v. Suzuki Motor Co., Ltd.Illinois Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Robinson v. Toyota Motor Credit Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Oliveira v. Amoco Oil Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Zekman v. Direct American Marketers, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Saunders v. Michigan Avenue National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Western Capital Partners, LLC v. Chicago Title Insurance CompaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
  2. Siegel v. Shell Oil Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2007
  3. Gehrett v. Chrysler Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2008
  4. Wendorf v. LandersDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010
  5. Winnebago County Citizens for Controlled Growth v. County of WinnebagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API