New Milford Savings Bank v. Roina
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.
In this foreclosure action, the defendants R. Richard Roina as trustee, John R. Fiore, Charles A. Fiore and Pat J. Cutrone (defendants) appeal from the judgments of the trial court granting the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on the defendants’ counterclaim and granting the plaintiff’s motion for a deficiency judgment and supplemental judgment. The defendants claim that the trial court improperly granted summary judgment on their counterclaim. They also claim that General Statutes § 49-28,1 pursuant to which the trial court rendered the deficiency judgment, violates the due process…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United Oil Co. v. Urban Redevelopment CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Hammer v. Lumberman's Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Connell v. ColwellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Burns v. Hartford HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Batick v. SeymourSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Connecticut National Bank v. RytmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Rockwell v. QuintnerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Bank of Boston Connecticut v. Scott Real Estate, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Citicorp Mortgage, Inc. v. PortoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Martin v. Town of WestportConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.