Adams v. Carrie F. Wright Hospital
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtSnow, J.
In this state the identity of a beneficiary under a will presents a question of fact to be determined by the court from the language employed, construed in the light of all the competent evidence. Great liberality is shown in seeking the intention of the testator in this respect. Clark v. Campbell, post, 281, and cases cited. The will here under consideration is crudely drawn and bears evidence that the language employed was used according to its most commonplace signification. When, in ordinary conversation among laymen, reference is made to a designated person and his family, the word…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hall v. StephensSupreme Court of Missouri · 1877
- Executors of White v. WhiteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1857
- Crosgrove v. CrosgroveSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1897
- Downes v. LongCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1894
3Cited by5 opinions
- Region 10 Client Management, Inc. v. Town of HampsteadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
- McAllister v. ElliotSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1928
- Nashua Trust Co. v. BurkeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1930
- Keene v. Union School DistrictSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1938
- Wallace v. BrownSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1938