Legal Opinion

Nashua Trust Co. v. Burke

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 2, 1930PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeaslee, C. J.

The case is incomplete. It does not state whether the allegations of the bill were admitted, and the facts are not found. Certain evidence is transferred for the “assistance to the court in the determination of the questions involved.” This court has no jurisdiction to find the facts in cases transferred from the superior court. Coles v. Railroad, 74 N. H. 425. It follows that the transfer of the evidence cannot affect the decision here. But as the evidence only tends to sustain the allegations of the bill, it is assumed that the parties are content to have the case disposed of in accordance…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gafney v. KenisonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1887
  2. Drake v. TrueSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1903
  3. Coles v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1908
  4. Stevens v. DouglassSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1894
  5. Adams v. Carrie F. Wright HospitalSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gale v. GaleSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1932
  2. Pettee v. Omega Chapter of Alpha Gamma RhoSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1934
  3. Keene v. Union School DistrictSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1938
  4. Laconia v. County of BelknapSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1934
  5. Carpenter v. SmithSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API