Legal Opinion

Wallace v. Brown

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 6, 1938PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The executrix is entitled to no advice as to the estates and powers intended to be vested in the devisees and legatees of the residue. Bailey v. McIntire, 71 N. H. 329; Harvey v. Harvey, 73 N. H. 106. Nor is the widow, in her capacity as non-fiduciary beneficiary. Glover v. Baker, 76 N. H. 393; Ross v. Church, 77 N. H. 592; Adams v. Wright Hospital, 82 N. H. 260; Owen v. Rusiel, 83 N. H. 345, 347; Keene v. District, ante, 477. No adverse claim appears to have been made, so this is not a proper case for amendment into a petition for a declaratory judgment. Laws 1929, c. 86.

Petition dismissed.

Br…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Glover v. BakerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1912
  2. Adams v. Carrie F. Wright HospitalSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1926
  3. Bailey v. McIntireSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1902
  4. Harvey v. HarveySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1904
  5. Ross v. ChurchSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Beaudoin v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API