Legal Opinion

Crosgrove v. Crosgrove

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 13, 1897PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Suit to determine the validity and construction of the will of Hugh Crosgrove of Norwich, deceased, brought to the Superior Court in New London County and reserved by that court, Elmer, J., upon the facts stated in the complaint, for the consideration and advice of this court.

Read the full summary

Suit to determine the validity and construction of the will of Hugh Crosgrove of Norwich, deceased, brought to the Superior Court in New London County and reserved by that court, Elmer, J., upon the facts stated in the complaint, for the consideration and advice of this court. The will was as follows:—“Be it known to all persons: “That I Hugh Crosgrov of the Town of Norwich in the County of New London in the State of Connecticut being of lawful age, of sound and disposing mind, memory and judgment and under no improper influence or restraint do hereby make publish and declare this to be my…

1Opinion of the CourtHamerslby, J.

The word “family” is one of variable meaning; and when used in a will as descriptive of the beneficiaries of a legacy, its legal import will be determined by the intention of the testator expressed in the language of the whole instrument, read in the light of relevant circumstances existing at the time of execution. Smith v. Wildman, 37 Conn. 384; Wood v. Wood, 63. id. 317; St.John, Admr., v. Dann, 66 id. 401, 405. This will, evidently the product of an intelligent although quite unlettered person, contains nineteen briefly expressed bequests, of which all but two are to the brother and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gold v. JudsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1852
  2. Smith v. WildmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1870
  3. Bristol v. Ontario Orphan AsylumSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1891
  4. Morris v. GrinnellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1883

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Kingsley v. Hawthorne Fabrics, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
  2. Piccinim v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1919
  3. Angus v. NobleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1900
  4. Millstein v. YostCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1951
  5. Dalton v. Knights of ColumbusSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1907

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API