Legal Opinion
State v. Abe
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 25, 1980No. 49691PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TODD, Justice.
Stephen T. Abe was arrested upon suspicion of driving while intoxicated. He was given an implied consent warning. 1 He contacted his brother who is a lawyer. He then submitted to a blood test. The results of the test were suppressed by the county court for failure to give a 90-day warning in addition to the 6-month implied consent warning. The district court panel reversed the trial court, and Abe was granted permission to appeal. We affirm.
The facts have been stipulated to by the parties. The stipulation provides in part:
On January 12, 1978, Defendant Stephen T. Abe was stopped…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State, Department of Public Safety v. WiehleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
3Cited by12 opinions
- McDonnell v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- Holtz v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1983
- Davis v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
- State v. GrossSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Davis v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.