Mace v. Atlantic Refining & Marketing Corp.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
CAVANAUGH, Judge:
We are presently obliged to embark upon the murky waters of Pennsylvania contractual indemnification law.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
On December 8, 1992, plaintiff Mace was at an A-Plus Mini-Market in Philadelphia. He was severely battered with a baseball bat by Perry, an employee of the store. Perry was employed by Barqawi who possessed and operated the market under lease from Atlantic.1 Thus, we have a lawsuit by a victim against the perpetrator employee, the operator-employer, and owner of a retail enterprise.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Plaintiff Mace sued the three defendants and Atlantic…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Perry v. PayneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
- Ruzzi v. Butler Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Bester v. Essex Crane Rental Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. MATX, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- McAdoo Borough v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- MacE v. Atlantic Refining & Marketing Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Hailey, L. v. Baribault, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
- MacE v. Atlantic Refining & Marketing Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Vasaturo v. Nason & Cullen Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County2001