Legal Opinion

Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. MATX, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 21, 1997No. 00783PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CERCONE, President Judge Emeritus.

This is an appeal from an order of the lower court granting summary judgment in appellee’s (plaintiffs) favor. We affirm.

The lower court summarized the pertinent facts of the ease as follows:

Presently before the court are the motion for summary judgment of plaintiff Bethlehem Steel Corporation (“Bethlehem Steel”) and the cross motion for summary judgment of defendant MATX, Inc. (“MATX”). In the current action Bethlehem Steel seeks indemnification from MATX. The following factual background explains the basis of Bethlehem Steel’s claim.

In July 1985 defendant…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Perry v. PayneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
  2. Charles Sean Kruzits and Mary Kruzits v. Okuma MacHine Tool, Inc. Heller Financial, Inc. Gosiger, Inc. v. Vincent W. Visco, D/B/A Vistek Industries, Third-Party Heller Financial, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  3. Ruzzi v. Butler Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Hunger v. Grand Central SanitationSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Village Beer & Beverage, Inc. v. Vernon D. Cox & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Rush v. Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Jarl Investments, L.P. v. FleckSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Nationscredit Commercial Corp. v. Grauel Enterprises, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Kellers Systems, Inc. v. Transport International Pool, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2001
  5. Alliance Metals, Inc. v. Hinely Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API