Legal Opinion

MacE v. Atlantic Refining & Marketing Corp.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 12, 2001No. 5 EAP 2000PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NIGRO, Justice.

Appellee Bassam Barqawi, t/a A-Plus Mini Market, (“Barqawi”) operated an A-Plus convenience store and gas station (“A-Plus”) in Philadelphia pursuant to a franchise agreement and a real estate lease with Appellant Atlantic Refining & Marketing Corporation (“Atlantic”). Under the franchise agreement and real estate lease (collectively “Agreement and Lease”) signed by the parties, Barqawi took sole possession and control of the premises on April 1, 1992. The terms of the Agreement and Lease required Barqawi to indemnify and defend Atlantic from all personal injury lawsuits…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hutchison v. Sunbeam Coal Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Steuart v. McChesneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Gedeon v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. Phillips v. A-Best Products Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Perry v. PayneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. LJL Transportation, Inc. v. Pilot Air Freight Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. Tindall v. FriedmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Chen v. ChenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. Kmart of Pennsylvania L.P. v. MD Mall Associates, LLCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  5. Imperial Excavating & Paving, LLC v. Rizzetto Construction Management, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API