Andrus v. North American Bank, No. Cv89-028908 (Apr. 3, 1991)
Connecticut Superior Court
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON MOTION TO STRIKE The defendant has filed a motion to strike the third and fifth counts of the plaintiff's amended complaint. With a motion to strike all of the facts alleged in the complaint and facts necessarily implied from those allegations are accepted as true, and the complaint is construed in the manner most favorable to the pleader. Blancato v. Feldspar Corporation, 203 Conn. 34, 36, 37. While a motion to strike admits all facts pleaded, it does not admit legal conclusions or the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Mingachos v. CBS, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Hinchliffe v. American Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Blancato v. Feldspar Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Mead v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Conaway v. PrestiaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.