Legal Opinion
Barrow v. Pennington
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided October 7, 1998No. 49A02-9804-CV-349PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBB, Judge.
Case Summary
AppellanWDefendant, Charles Barrow (“Barrow”), appeals the trial court’s judgment denying his Verified Motion For Relief From Default Judgment. We reverse.
Issues
Barrow raises two issues for our review. We find one dispositive:
1. Whether the trial court had personal jurisdiction over Barrow (whether service of process complied with Indiana Trial Rule 4.1).
Facts and Procedural History
A default judgment was entered against Barrow in favor of David Pennington (“Pennington”). Prior to this action, the Sheriff of Marion County allegedly delivered the underlying…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- LaPalme v. RomeroIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
- Glennar Mercury-Lincoln, Inc. v. RileyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
- Chaney v. ReddinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
- Idlewine v. Madison County Bank & Trust Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1982
- Storey Oil Co. v. American States InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hill v. RameyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- Reed Sign Service, Inc. v. ReidIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- Norris v. Personal FinanceIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- LePore v. Norwest Bank Indiana, N.A.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- Sells v. BerryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.