Legal Opinion
LaPalme v. Romero
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided October 20, 1993No. 45S03-9310-CV-1136PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON PETITION TO TRANSFER
DeBRULER, Justice.
In an action for personal injury, the Lake Circuit Court, Lorenzo Arredondo, J., entered a default judgment against Andre LaPalme and Danaca Transport LTEE, defendants. Promptly upon learning of the default judgment, first Danaca and then LaPalme filed motions to set aside the judgment pursuant to Ind. Trial Rule 60(B). The trial court denied the motions. The Court of Appeals (Third District) affirmed the trial court. LaPaime v. Romero (1998), Ind.App., 606 N.E.2d 882. Danaca and LaPalme seek transfer to this Court. Transfer is granted. Pursuant to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McCullough v. Archbold Ladder Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1993
- Spangler v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
- Southern Indiana Railway Co. v. Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1907
- Overhauser v. FowlerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
- Morrison v. Professional Billing Services, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Robert SWAIM, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MOLTAN COMPANY, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Lisa Homer v. Nathaniel Jones-BeyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- Stidham v. WhelchelIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. WillitsIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
- Charnas v. Estate of LoizosIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.