Hill v. Ramey
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MATTINGLY, Judge.
Philip P. Hill appeals the trial court's denial of his Motion for Relief from Order pursuant to Trial Rule 60(B)(6). We reverse.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On April 16, 1999, Daniel and Christina Ramey filed a Petition for Temporary Protective Order and Notice of Filing P.O. (Protective Order) with the Jennings Superior Court.1 A temporary protective order was issued, and the trial court scheduled a hearing on the Protective Order for April 28, 1999.
On April 20, 1999, the Jackson County Sheriff's Department placed a copy of the Protective Order and summons addressed to…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Johnson County Rural Electric Membership Corp. v. BurnellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
- Stidham v. WhelchelIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
- Blair v. EmmertIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
- Fisher v. BD., MT. PLEASANT TP. COM. SCHOOLSIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
- Mills v. CoilIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Scanlan v. TownsendWashington Supreme Court · 2014
- Damon Corp. v. EstesIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- Thomison v. IK Indy, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- Norris v. Personal FinanceIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Hartig v. StratmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.