Legal Opinion
Carradine v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided September 23, 1980No. 79-100PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FERREN, Associate Judge:
The trial court revoked David Carradine’s probation after he voluntarily appeared in court, requesting more intensive psychotherapy than the outpatient care he was receiving as an express condition of probation. On appeal, Carradine asserts that the trial court’s action deprived him of due process and, in any event, was an abuse of discretion, as there was no allegation or proof that he had violated the terms of his probation. We agree that Carradine was denied due process. We reverse the revocation order. 1
I
On February 14, 1978, appellant David Carradine pleaded…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Robinson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Escoe v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- State v. AustinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
- Resper v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Saunders v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- Herold v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1982
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.