Saunders v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Following a probation revocation hearing, the trial court revoked appellant’s probation and executed a sentence of five to fifteen years imprisonment. On appeal, appellant contends that the trial court’s decision revoking his probation was not supported by substantial evidence, and thus was an abuse of discretion, and that the trial court’s failure to execute a written statement containing evidentiary findings and reasoned conclusions of law was a violation of appellant’s due process rights. We affirm.
I
In 1982, a jury convicted appellant of armed robbery. 1 Thereafter, Judge Shuker, the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Bearden v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Black v. RomanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Cole v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Trice v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1997
- Ex Parte StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
- State v. BaxterConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- Harris v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Air Products & Chemicals, Inc. v. Board of Assessment AppealsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.