Legal Opinion
Martin v. City of Indianapolis
District Court, S.D. Indiana
Decided November 4, 1998No. IP 96-0330-C B/SPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ENTRY DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO ALTER THE JUDGMENT AND AWARDING ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS
BARKER, Chief Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs motion to alter or amend the judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) 1 and Plaintiffs petition for attorney’s fees and costs. For the reasons set forth below, we deny Plaintiffs motion and award Plaintiff $131,252.55 in attorney’s fees, costs and expenses.
MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND JUDGMENT
In an entry dated April 16, 1998, the Court awarded Plaintiff, Jan Martin (“Martin”), $20,000 in statutory damages and reasonable…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blanchard v. BergeronSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Julie Chalmers v. City of Los Angeles, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- William McNabola v. Chicago Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in Its Corporate Capacity v. George C. Meyer, Margaret Meyer & Edwin A. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Baker v. John Morrell & Co.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2003
- Eli Lilly & Co. v. Zenith Goldline Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2003
- Knutson v. Ag Processing, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2003
- Marsh Supermarkets, Inc. v. MarshDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2013
- American River Trees, et al. v. Central Valley Protection Board, et al.District Court, E.D. California · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.