Legal Opinion

Filippone v. Mayor of Newton

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided August 7, 1984PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNolan, J.

This matter is before us following the granting of the defendants’ application for further appellate review. The Appeals Court held invalid, as an impermissible exercise of home rule powers, a Newton ordinance providing for indemnification of municipal employees who are named as defendants in civil rights actions. Filippone v. Mayor of Newton, 16 Mass. App. Ct. 417, 426 (1983). For reasons set forth below, we disagree with the conclusion of the Appeals Court and we affirm the judgment for the defendants in the Superior Court. 3

1. Factual background and prior proceedings. This case arises from…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wellesley College v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  2. Borman v. BormanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  3. Bloom v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  4. First National Bank v. SladeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  5. Massachusetts Turnpike Authority v. Perini Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Pinshaw v. Metropolitan District CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
  2. Commonwealth v. ELM Medical Laboratories, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1992
  3. Howard v. Town of BurlingtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
  4. Juliano v. SimpsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
  5. Maimaron v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API