Legal Opinion
Pinshaw v. Metropolitan District Commission
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided June 30, 1988PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAbrams, J.
Through an assignment of rights, the plaintiff, Alan Pinshaw, seeks to enforce Metropolitan District Commission (MDC) Officer Frederick Monk’s rights to indemnification under G. L. c. 92, § 63B, added by St. 1948, c. 653,1 and G. L. c. 258, § 9A, added by St. 1982, c. 345.2 Both parties *689moved for summary judgment on a statement of agreed facts and supporting documents. The Superior Court judge granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment. We granted direct appellate review. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.
We summarize the agreed facts. On August 28, 1978, the plaintiff…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Smith v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Brown v. FelsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Cassesso v. Commissioner of CorrectionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- G.S. Enterprises, Inc. v. Falmouth Marine, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Merlonghi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
- Rakes v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
- Clickner v. City of LowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
- Armstrong v. LamyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1996
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.