Legal Opinion

Sherman v. Good

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided October 26, 1926No. 8 Div. 448PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSamford, J.

Under the evidence, appellee agreed to purchase certain property from appellant and, as a part of the purchase price, he paid to appellant’s agent $200. The agreement called for an abstract to be furnished appellee, within 30 days, showing a merchantable title, which was not done, whereupon appellee refused to consummate the purchase, rescinded the contract, and demanded a return of the purchase money paid. The title not being merchantable, as agreed, the appellee was entitled to a recovery, and, there being no dispute as to the above facts, the court properly gave the general affirmative…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wood v. WoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
  2. Flinn v. BarberSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
  3. Daly v. BrockSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1913
  4. Beard v. DuBoseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  5. Broughton v. BroughtonAlabama Court of Appeals · 1919

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. CarrellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  2. Benedict v. NielsenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  3. Whitfield v. McClendonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  4. Northwestern Rug Mfg. Co. v. Russellville Furniture & Mercantile Co.Alabama Court of Appeals · 1928
  5. Bridgeforth v. National Life Accident Ins. Co.Alabama Court of Appeals · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API