Legal Opinion

Daly v. Brock

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 30, 1913No. 19,558PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from Oivil District Court, Parish of Orleans; Porter Parker, Judge. Action by S. J. Daly against Richard Brock. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals suspensively, and moves for rule to show cause why the inscription of the judgment should not be canceled.

1Opinion of the Court

On Rule.

MONROE, J.

[1] Plaintiff obtained a moneyed judgment against defendant, from which defendant perfected a suspensive appeal to this court, the transcript having been lodged here in July, 1912. He now appears, alleging that the judgment appealed from has- been inscribed in the mortgage office, and operates to prevent his disposing of certain real estate of which he is the owner; and he has ruled the plaintiff and the recorder of mortgages to show cause why the inscription should not be canceled. The recorder admits that the judgment is inscribed, as alleged, but disclaims any personal…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dannenmann v. CharltonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1903
  2. Cluseau v. WagnerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1910

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. CarrellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  2. Stephens v. WalkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  3. Illinois Cent. R. Co. v. PoseySupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  4. Riccobono v. KearneySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
  5. Denny v. Jefferson Const. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1927

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API