Legal Opinion

United States v. Orostin

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided February 20, 1990No. ACM 27564PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

KASTL, Senior Judge:

The appellant was convicted of soliciting the contract killing of his wife, in violation of Article 134, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 934. Before us, he argues that the evidence at trial was insufficient to convict. We disagree and affirm.

The Appellant and “Luciano Angelini”

In September 1988, the Government inserted an individual using the alias of “Luciano Angelini” into the locale around Holloman Air Force Base, New Mexico. In reality, “Angelini” was an undercover agent of the Air Force Office of Special Investigations, tasked with ferreting out *521information regarding use of…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. SalesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  3. Braham v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  4. State v. FurrSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  5. People v. AalbuSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. GibsonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990
  2. United States v. LozickiUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API