United States v. Ralbovsky
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OP THE COURT
JAMES, Judge:
Convicted (contrary to his pleas) of an assault and an indecent assault, appellant was sentenced to be discharged from the service with a bad conduct discharge, to be confined for 9 months, to forfeit $250.00 pay per month for 9 months, and to be reduced to E-1. The convening authority approved the sentence as adjudged.
I. Prior Review
On appeal Airman Ralbovsky briefed two errors: that the convictions are “against the manifest weight of the evidence” and that the staff judge advocate’s recommendations “unfairly prejudiced appellant’s right to have matters…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. TurnerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
- United States v. SnellingUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
- United States v. HealyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
- United States v. HillUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
- United States v. WingartUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. BranoffU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1992
- United States v. WilsonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1991
- United States v. KomorousU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1991