Legal Opinion
State v. Ricketts
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided January 15, 2013No. AC 33059PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BEACH, J.
The defendant, Sean T. Ricketts, appeals from the judgment of the trial court finding him in violation of probation pursuant to General Statutes § 53a-32. The defendant claims that (1) the evidence was insufficient to support the finding that he had violated the terms of his probation and (2) the court abused *259its discretion in sentencing him for a violation of probation. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The trial court found the following facts. On January 29, 2008, the defendant was convicted of robbery in the second degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-135…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. FaganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Fagan v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- State v. PrestonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- State v. HillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- State v. RodriguezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. BrownConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- State v. Santos T.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- State v. Paul B.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- RKG Management, LLC v. Roswell Sedona Associates, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2013