Legal Opinion

State v. Paul B.

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided July 2, 2013No. AC 33473PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BEAR, J.

The defendant, Paul B., appeals from the judgment of conviction, following a jury trial, of two counts of risk of injury to a child in violation of General Statutes § 53-21 (a) (2). On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) the trial court improperly admitted hearsay statements of the victims through the testimony of an expert witness; (2) the trial court improperly admitted hearsay statements of the victims to provide context for a police officer’s testimony about her interview with the defendant and failed to provide the jury with a limiting instruction for such hearsay…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  2. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  3. State v. FergusonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  4. State v. CutlerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  5. State v. FloresSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Eubanks v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
  2. State v. ArtiacoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  3. State v. BurnsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2026
  4. State v. Paul B.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API