State v. Paul B.
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BEAR, J.
The defendant, Paul B., appeals from the judgment of conviction, following a jury trial, of two counts of risk of injury to a child in violation of General Statutes § 53-21 (a) (2). On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) the trial court improperly admitted hearsay statements of the victims through the testimony of an expert witness; (2) the trial court improperly admitted hearsay statements of the victims to provide context for a police officer’s testimony about her interview with the defendant and failed to provide the jury with a limiting instruction for such hearsay…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. FergusonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- State v. CutlerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- State v. FloresSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Eubanks v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
- State v. ArtiacoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- State v. BurnsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2026
- State v. Paul B.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2014