Arthur v. Pullman Co.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of Hew York, second district, borough of Manhattan, in favor of the plaintiff.
1Opinion of the CourtFreedman, P. J.
There is no dispute as to the material facts in this case. The plaintiff, on October 11, 1901, in company with two ladies, purchased tickets for Loon Lake West, a station in the Adirondacks, and became a passenger on the Montreal Express, which left the Grand G'entral Station in Hew York city on that day at six twenty-five p. m. The tickets entitled the party to one berth and-to a drawing-room, or stateroom, at the extreme north end of the forward sleeping car on'the train. The door at this end of the car was locked. At first, the plaintiff put his -baggage into the berth and the ladies put…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Carpenter v. . N.Y., N.H. H.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Adams v. . New Jersey Steamboat Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Williams v. WebbAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1899
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sherman v. Pullman Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1913
- Goldstein v. Pullman Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
- Van Dike v. Pullman Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1932
- Barnet v. Pullman Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1935