Legal Opinion

Barnet v. Pullman Co.

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided March 13, 1935Published

1Opinion of the CourtKeller, J.

I am constrained, under the decided cases, to grant the motion.

My reasons are that a passenger on a railroad train, whether in a Pullman car or in an ordinary coach, may not claim the protection of the hotelkeeper’s or the innkeeper’s liability, under common law or as modified by statute. The liability, under the cases that you have cited in your brief for the plaintiff, are all common carrier cases, wherein there is an insurer’s liability under the statute. In those cases defendants’ liability is more -than a liability for negligence: They are insurers of the safety of the article, subject…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Goldstein v. . Pullman Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. Arthur v. Pullman Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API